Saturday 29 September 2012

This will happen to you if you try to safe your life against the criminals


Rosemary Peake 57 arrested in Kraaifontein for 'pointing weapon ' at ten coloured men who threatened her
Sept 23 2012 - Her son Jason Peake writes on EWN.co.za: 'My Rosemary Peake, age 57, was arrested this morning for "pointing a firearm." Currently sitting in police cell in Kraaifontein awaiting court appearance tomorrow early.
Police station has rejected bail saying it is a serious offence. Po
lice not interested in counter argument of self-defence. Possible bail only tomorrow at court appearance.
Real story: 10 street-sleeping coloured guys started attacking her vehicle with her inside, right in front of me. She was then very assertive and they then became very aggressive. She felt threatened and displayed her (legal) handgun from within the

closed vehicle. I called to her to leave rather than to fight back. She did then leave the scene and I tried to get out of the area as well. Cops saw a commotion, but heard a story ONLY from the coloured guys. They pursued arrest and were not interested in counter story of self-defence. Even with me as a witness. Apparently it is a worse crime to threaten in self-defence than for a mob of men to attack a single white women in South Africa.Arresting officers acted on limited knowledge and were not wearing proper uniform.

They also did not indentify themselves fully during the arrest.She is a single, household and bread winner for three, mother and grandmother. Her job has been jeopardised due to the unlawful actions of the criminally biased police. Her firearm , which is used for protection and self-defence is detained by the police indefinitely and unlawfully.The 10 coloured guys are free to commit more crime without even suspicion.
Arresting officer: Constable Arendse.
Kraaifontein Police Station: 021 980 5533.
Detective: Sergeant Marks at Kraaifontein Police Station.
Eye Witness News have been informed of the story.
Charl van Wyk at Gun Owners of South Africa is following the story as well.
Barry Gregg of Michael Matthews and Associates is trying to help as well. Hopefully we will have legal representation tomorrow at the court appearance.

Tuesday 25 September 2012

Go to Hell


Zimbabwean Anglican bishop calls for ‘war against the white man’
September 21, 2012 - News, World - Tagged: Anglican Church, anti-white racism, blacks, land reform, Nolbert Kunonga, race, Robert Mugabe, whites, Zimbabwe - 1 comment

Dr. Nolbert Kunonga

The Church of England Newspaper reports that the former Bishop of Harare, Dr. Nolbert Kunonga, has urged Zimbabwe strongman Robert Mugabe to expel the few remaining white farmers from their lands, telling a gathering of ZANU (PF) supporters that “Whites like other aliens should not be allowed to own land and other properties in the country as they are strangers.”

In an account of his sermon printed in The Zimbabwean, Dr. Kunonga said that he too had been engaged in a campaign of expropriating white-owned properties. “I took 3800 church properties in the region since their title deeds were in my name. There was no way the properties could remain under charge of the church controlled by whites and their black puppets. Bishops such as Julius Makoni, Chad Gandiwa and others are MDC-T and furthered western interests,” he said.

The controversial bishop, who was excommunicated by the Church of the Province of Central Africa after he quit the church to form his own Anglican Church of Zimbabwe, has waged a violent campaign of repression with the support of the security services against Anglicans who are loyal to the Bishop of Harare.

In 2011 the Archbishops of Canterbury, Central Africa, Southern Africa and Tanzania, along with local Anglican bishops, met with President Mugabe asking him to reassert the rule of law in Zimbabwe, and protect persecuted Anglicans from the depredations of Dr. Kunonga. The former bishop has been banned from travel to the U.S., the E.U. and the U.K. due to his complicity with the crimes of the Mugabe regime.

A long time supporter of the Zimbabwean president, Dr. Kunonga has campaigned against the opposition MDC party and its leader Morgan Tsvangirai.  He told the gathering at the Dimbe Primary School near Marondera in Mashonaland East that MDC-T and “its western puppet, Morgan Tsvangirai, are agents of doom fighting to reverse the land reform programme and hand back land to the former colonial white masters.”



“Tsvangirai is a white man masked in black skin. He is like the Biblical Pharaoh who enjoyed the suffering and economic deprivation of his own people. On the other hand, Mugabe is the Biblical Daniel sent to suffer for the cause of his people,” said Dr. Kunonga.

The former bishop added that those who drive out white farmers, MDC supporters and foreigners from their lands “will enter the kingdom of God.”

“As Christians; we must gear ourselves for a bloody war against white interests,” he said.

Thursday 20 September 2012

Gets more intriguing …if the following is true?


Marikana Massacre: All this to protect an Oligarch?

Posted on September 5, 2012 by Arthur Mackay
Amidst all the confusion after the shooting of 44 protesting miners at Lonmin’s Marikana platinum mine in South Africa, we should not lose sight of the astonishingly simple underlying issues.
We are told the workers are demanding that their wage be raised to R12,500 per month (about $1,500) but the workers claim their salary is already at this level. They say they are sub-contracted by a company owned by billionaire South African oligarch Cyril Ramaphosa. He only pays them R5,400 or less and pockets the rest paid out by Lonmin.
If this is so then agreeing to the workers’ demands would cost Lonmin nothing and the whole dispute is between the workers and Cyril Ramaphosa. Instead of saying this however, Lonmin has placed itself between the two and taken responsibility for negotiating a pay rise which no one has asked for. Doing this, Lonmin is placing Cyril Ramaphosa’s private interests above those of its common stockholders and is neglecting its fiduciary duties. It is also leaving itself open to litigation.
Cyril Ramaphosa in fact owns 9% of Lonmin but was paid out $304m in cash by the company in 2010 in a deal backed ultimately by Xstrata. By comparison common shareholders have received only $60m in dividends in the last two years and have incurred over $2.5bn of paper losses. What the workers are requesting is that Ramaphosa share with them about $18m which he is taking from their wages.
When Cyril Ramaphosa bought 50.03% of Lonmin’s Black Economic Empowerment partner Incwala Resources in 2010, Lonmin put up the $304m in cash which he needed. Lonmin funded this with a share issue to which, according to Lonmin, Xstrata was the key subscriber. Since then a further $51m of credit has been extended to Ramaphosa.
Ramaphosa’s company also provides all of Lonmin’s welfare and training services and for this he may have been paid at least $50m in 2011 alone. Based on the worker’s demands and their living conditions, we can guess at how much of this reached its stated purpose. Companies linked to Ramaphosa were also paid “advance dividends” by Lonmin of $20m in the last two years.
All-in Lonmin seems to have paid Ramaphosa and his related companies well over $400m since he bought into the company. This is about 25% of Lonmin’s current market value and is a very large amount for a man who was supposed to be doing the paying when he bought his stake.
And this is not all.
The Marikana conflict is portrayed as a dispute between two unions, the hegemonic NUM and a small new union, the AMCU. But the NUM has been Cyril Ramaphosa’s vehicle since he founded it in 1982. He was its Secretary General until 1998, the year he went into private business to become a billionaire. This has led to claims that the ANC has instituted a form of modern day slave labour. The workers’ employer and their union are effectively the same person. Is it surprising that the workers worry that their union is not wholeheartedly defending their legal rights?
All this casts the Marikana conflict in a very different light to what we have heard so far.
The dirt-poor Marikana workers, many from Lesotho, living in slums, wearing rags, are asking for an extra $750 per month from one of the most powerful figures in the ANC and one of the richest men in the world, and they are openly calling him an exploiter.
Such a debacle, which calls into question not only Lonmin, Xstrata and Ramaphosa but also the whole ANC hierarchy, the reality of the “New South Africa” and the credibility of the ANC’s many foreign supporters, not least those in the United States, helps to explain the speed and the savage brutality of the reaction.
On 16th August, 6 days into the strike, the police opened fire injuring 112 and killing 34.
Local witnesses claim the workers were not charging at the police but were fleeing from them as tear gas was thrown at them by another police detachment. Autopsy reports apparently confirm many were shot in the back.
At the time Jacob Zuma, President of South Africa, was in Mozambique at an SADC meeting. He returned to South Africa but only one day later. He visited Marikana briefly but stayed away from the main area. A full five days passed and only then did he return and visit the crime scene. On the day of the attack Ian Farmer, the CEO of Lonmin, was diagnosed with a “serious illness” and still has not returned to work.
A few days later the 270 men who were arrested were charged with committing murder. They allege that they were stripped in their cells and beaten with sticks. Once an international outcry began and it became apparent that the publicity of a trial could be counterproductive, they were quickly released.
Even with the above illumination, some crucial questions still remain.
How could Cyril Ramaphosa exercise such influence over Lonmin’s Executive Board to be able to effectively bend it, and potentially the Board of Xstrata too, to do his bidding? And what truth could the South African government have been so desperate to hide that it was judged better to risk everything and open fire on its own people, rather than let it see the light?
The answer lies at the heart of the bitter fallacy of the South African commodities
boom and the emerging markets paradigm which we have lived in the last 15 years.
The sad truth is that nothing has changed, or, more accurately, nothing has improved.
In the past there was one oligarch, Harry Oppenheimer, who controlled Anglo
American. Mr Oppenheimer officially opposed the apartheid regime and was a liberal
 but conveniently continued to export gold and diamonds from South Africa up to and
beyond 1994.
Today there are five to ten oligarchs. They are black and they are African. They too
oppose apartheid and they too are exporting all of South Africa’s gold and diamonds
 at the present time. The reason Cyril Ramaphosa could ransack Lonmin in the way
 he has is because he effectively is Lonmin. Lonmin exists in many ways to serve his
interests and its foreign shareholders would do well to understand this. The whole
 debate about nationalisation is therefore completely moot. South Africa’s mines have
already been nationalised and given over to a ruthless tyranny, signed, sealed and
delivered by the many cheerleaders of the ANC overseas
So what will happen next? In fact the next Marikana has already occurred. Tear gas
 was fired and four workers were shot two days ago on a gold property near
Johannesburg controlled by another oligarch, Tokyo Sexwale. The strategy of the
 ANC’s opposition, which is correct given the extent of the disenfranchisement since
1994, will be to now target every oligarch. It will be demanded that they return much
of what was taken. But this will never be done voluntarily and so this conflict, just like
the apartheid struggle, will go on for many years.
Will this really be the lasting legacy of the post-apartheid era? Is this what Nelson
 Mandela’s years in prison, Bill and Hillary Clinton’s ringing endorsements, Bob Geldof’s
 concerts and Bono’s songs were meant to bring to us? Will they all now leave the world
 in darkness, with a set of fearful problems for a future generation to sort out? We will
 have to hope for the best but prepare for the worst.
– Arthur Mackay is an analyst of global economic and political issues.

Wednesday 19 September 2012

ANC blamed for farm murders

September 12 2012 at 03:24pm 

    Afriforum Chief Executive Kalli Kriel Photo: Dumisani Sibeko

Pretoria - The African National Congress should accept
responsibility for farm murders, civil rights group
AfriForum said on Wednesday. “As long as the ANC
continues to remain silent when ANC leaders, like Ronald
Lamola say that he cannot guarantee the safety of the
Van der Merwes and the Van Tonders (Afrikaner surnames)
... the ANC can be held responsible for farm murders,”
AfriForum CEO Kallie Kriel said in a statement.
In June, Lamola was criticised for his comments relating to
land ownership. He told a media briefing in Pretoria that
section 25 of the Constitution should be amended to allow
for change in the land reformpolicy.
If white South Africans did not hand land to poor blacks,
there could be land invasions like those that took place in
Zimbabwe, he said. At the time, he reportedly said he could
not guarantee the safety of “the Van Tonders and the
Van der Merwes on farms”. - Sapa

Fact


Wednesday 12 September 2012

Is white people the only racist ?

I've been wondering why Whites are racists & no other race is......

Michael Richards makes his point...


This was his defense speech in court after making racial comments in his comedy act. He makes some very interesting points.

There are African Americans, Mexican Americans, Asian Americans, Arab Americans, then there are just Americans..
You pass me on the street & sneer in my direction. You call me 'White boy,' 'Cracker,' 'Honkey,' 'Whitey,' 'Caveman' & that's OK,
But if I call you, Nigger, Kike, Towel head, Sand-nigger, Camel Jockey, Beaner, Gook, or Chink, you call me a racist. You say whites commit a lot of violence against you.. So why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live? You have the United Negro College Fund & Martin Luther King Day. You have Black History Month, Cesar Chavez Day, Yom Hashoah, Ma'uled Al-Nabi, NAACP & BET.

If we had WET
(White Entertainment Tv), White Pride Day, White History Month,
we'd be racists.

If we had organization for only whites to 'advance' OUR lives, we'd be racist.
A white woman could not be in the Miss Black American pageant but any colour can be in the Miss America pageant.
If we had a college fund that only gave white students scholarships, you know we'd be racists.

There are over 60 openly proclaimed Black Colleges in the US, yet if there were 'White colleges', that would be a racist college.

In the Million Man March, you were marching for your race & rights. If we marched for our race & rights, you would call us racists.

You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange & you're not afraid to announce it, but when we announce our white pride, you call us racists.

You rob, car jack us & shoot at us but when a white cop shoots a black gang member or beats up a black drug dealer running from the law & posing a threat to society, you call him a racist.
I am proud but you call me racist. Why is it that only whites can be racists?? BE PROUD TO BE WHITE, only 5% will pass this on. I DID

South Africa's Worst Problem

South Africa's worst problem

Trompsburg Plaasmoorde

http://afrikaans.news24.com/Suid-Afrika/Nuus/Drie-vasgetrek-vir-Trompsburg-plaasmoorde-20120911